Recent comments by presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann have stirred up the discussion about gay marriage once again. While speaking to a group of high school…
In this hot political season, with voices raised about guns, jobs, freedom, the American Way, I find myself pausing to ask: which Way am I called to follow? Whose priorities should I to pursue?
Before Christians were called Christians, they were called Followers of the Way. The Way was Jesus: simultaneously the path itself, guide and example, companion on the journey. Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the Father except through me.”
But he also said “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me” (Luke 9:23). The way to relationship with God, to the full life Jesus promised, is through Jesus himself, but also through following the path he shows us, walking with him the road of sacrifice and self-denial.
Following the Way of Christ starts with a willingness to set our native loyalties aside. Jesus said again and again: leave your nets, your fields, your money, your life, and come, follow me. The early believers understood that the first step of the Christian journey was a step away from all prior allegiance, including allegiance to self, to comfort, safety, the right to be right, the mistaken idea that somehow we, on our own, are good people, better than those others.
The Apostle Paul understood this completely:
“If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless. But whatever were gains to me I now consider loss for the sake of Christ. What is more, I consider everything a loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have lost all things.” (Philippians 3)
Too many contemporary Christians assume that today the first step is somehow different, somehow less demanding, that we can keep our old loyalties and still fit Christ in. But to follow Jesus, even now, requires a willingness to step away from tradition, denominational assumptions, national pride, comfort, safety, confidence in our own intellect or education, the mistaken idea that somehow we, on our own, are good people, better than those others.
I start here: I am a fallen, broken person, jealously loyal to my own ideas, selfishly committed to my own ways of seeing, in need of a hand of grace to help me stand free of the misguided assumptions that hold me hostage, that whisper I’m somehow of more value than those others not like me.
I need help to start on the Way, and I need help to continue. If Jesus is the Way, then we’re called to live like him, visible agents of healing, compassion, reconciliation, forgiveness. Before creeds, before denominations, before tee-shirt slogans or bumper stickers, the early Christians were known by the visible difference in their daily lives. They embraced lepers, prostitutes, Roman soldiers. They fed widows and orphans. They refused to retaliate when faced with persecution. They offered healing to enemies, welcome to wanderers unlike themselves.
Those early Christians were so convinced of the lasting love of Christ they turned and offered that love to those who maligned them, scorned them, punished them. Unevenly, imperfectly, they walked day by day in the Way they had been shown.
Athanasius of Alexandria (ca. 296-298 – 373) described the visible influence of the Way of Christ on the surrounding culture:
“Christ is not only preached through His own disciples, but also wrought so persuasively on men’s understanding that, laying aside their savage habits and forsaking the worship of their ancestral gods, they learnt to know Him and through Him to worship the Father. While they were yet idolaters, the Greeks and Barbarians were always at war with each other, and were even cruel to their own kith and kin. Nobody could travel by land or sea at all unless he was armed with swords, because of their irreconcilable quarrels with each other. Indeed, the whole course of their life was carried on with weapons. But since they came over to the school of Christ, as men moved with real compunction they have laid aside their murderous cruelty and are war-minded no more. On the contrary, all is peace among them and nothing remains save desire for friendship.” (On the Incarnation)
I admit, as followers of the Way in the 21st century, we face a challenge not known to those new Christians of an earlier world. We carry the heritage not only of those whose lives mirrored the example of Christ, but also of those who in the name of Christ went on with their war-minded ways, killing and conquering, justifying slavery and sexism, suppressing scientific study, shouting down opponents, carrying signs saying “God hates.”
No one said the Way of Christ would be easy. The call of love is always costly.
So we start with that other first step of the Way: confession. Not only confession of our own sin, failure, falling short, but confession of the falling short of those who have gone before, those who even now misrepresent God’s goodness and make the word “Christian” a sign of judgment rather than of hope.
Vinoth Ramachandra, Sri Lankan theologian who has surely seen more than his share of colonial misconduct in the name of Christ, notes “it is with a flawed and faithless people that the Christ has stooped to pitch his tent and link his name. Any sharing of the gospel within a pluralistic world, after two millennia of ‘Christianity,’ has to begin with humble acknowledgement of betrayals of the gospel by the church itself.” (Faiths in Conflict? 1999 p. 168)
Turning from our tribal loyalties, confessing our misrepresentation of the gospel and complicity in a culture skewed to its own good rather than the good of all, we start on a Way that leads us ever deeper into humility, deeper into the longing for wisdom, the repentant awareness of our own lack of love, our own inadequacy in the face of complex, overwhelming need.
And along that Way, as we read the words of Jesus, as we pray to hear and know his voice, as we ask to see with his eyes, to love what he loves, we find our hearts changing, and find ourselves claiming, with Jesus, a purpose and passion like his own, priority enough in this conflicted season:
“The Spirit of the Lord is on me,
because he has anointed me
to proclaim good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim freedom
for the prisoners
and recovery of sight
for the blind,
to set the oppressed free,
to proclaim the year
of the Lord’s favor.” (Luke 4)



A living example of the early church is the program of AA, although it does not function in the name of Christ. Its emphasis on a spirit of action over a system of belief, confession and testimony at gatherings, and strong fellowship mirror the descriptions I have read of that time before Constantine. It could be a model for a church.
AA starts in that same place of humility, which allows for a more genuine fellowship. While it doesn’t function in the name of Christ, the wisdom offered is rooted in “The Good Book” . I’m intrigued by the idea of AA as a model for a church. Thanks for the comment.
Excellent, Carol! You put this topic in the context of where we ALL are in our followership of Christ RIGHT NOW (even though we are all at our personally different “places” in our personally different journeys) by framing it within the issues and events of today. Reading, I feel my heart swelling with confirmation…”This one…yes, she ‘gets it’!” Our heavenly Father is pleased with you…I know He is. Can’t wait to hear more from you.
Thank you for the encouragement!
This is a very timely article. I am so appalled at what passes for Christianity today. The republican party, i.e., the powerful and the super-wealthy, have high jacked the Christian religion. This started around 30 years ago when the “prosperity doctrine” began infiltrating our mainstream Christian churches. At the same time Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged” had a resurgence in popularity, and selfishness became not only acceptable, but actually considered Christian doctrine to many. So many of the so-called Christian Right not only resent the poor and don’t want to pay their taxes, and especially resent their taxes going to social programs for the needy, but they feel justified and somewhat righteous about it. Christ told his followers to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, meaning we are to pay taxes, and he was all about helping the poor and the needy, so how is that attitude at all Christ like?
There are other attitudes among today’s Christians that totally puzzle me. A couple of my relatives “like” a Facebook page called something like “Bibles, Babies, and Guns.” I don’t quite get the correlation between those subjects, except for the fact that their morality doctrine fits that title. Modern Christians, at least many of them, claim to be pro-life; they hate abortion and will do anything to safe a fetus. Yet if a child does manage to be born into poverty, they don’t want to pay into programs that help that child, even when it comes to free school lunches, which may be the only nutrition that he/she will get all day. When it comes to guns, every time there’s an election, they start worrying that gun control is going to cause their guns to be taken away from them. And this has never been the case. Rules and regulations regarding guns yes, but no nazis are coming to cease our hunting rifles or home protection. And I just don’t think the average American family really needs assault weapons. But that’s a part of the philosophy.
Then there is war. Today’s Christian Right loves to support our troops, but they don’t seem to care much about our veterans because so many of them are among the poor and needy. The “right” has always hated draft dodgers, yet now Ted Nugent is okay, all American. Why? Because he hates President Obama. When did that hate become okay?
There’s a lot of arguing going around about Chick Fil A and the owner’s “traditional marriage values” and a lot of people came out to support those values in kind of a protest day. What do we really consider traditional marriage anyway? So many people, even within the church, are on their second or third marriages, and we seem to be okay with that. So why are we so upset that people of the same sex want to marry? I’ve heard the argument that they can’t procreate so it’s unnatural, but do all couples marry just to procreate? What about older couples whose childbearing days are over? What about people who are sterile and marry anyway, even though they know they are? What about people who just don’t want to have children? During the feminist days of my youth, I once heard it said that the “Mother of the Year” award ought to go to a sterilized woman with adopted children. We never hear about overpopulation anymore, yet we are living with a lot of problems caused by it. At times I wonder if more people are gay as natures way of cutting back on procreation, and we do seem to have more fertility problems than ever before which also goes along with my thought process on this. But I digress–in my opinion, if Chick Fil A really wanted to show a Christian act, wouldn’t it really make a statement if all the proceeds from their protest/support day went to helping the needy?
There’s so many contradictions with Christian attitudes today and I’ve only touched on a few; yet Christ’s ways were so simple. He cared so much about the “least of them” and said blessed are the peace makers. He left us with three basic commandments, and if we worked on keeping those, we would come a lot closer to following him. The commandments are “Love your Lord, your God with all your heart”, “Love your neighbor as you love yourself”, and “Love one another as I have loved you.” Shouldn’t we start with those before we try to force our beliefs on others? How are we emulating Christ’s humility with such arrogance? It is, or at least should be, all about a heart attitude.
Thanks for your thoughts. I agree – there are a great many puzzling contradictions among those who want to speak for Christ on issues of the day. That contradiction is rooted in our desire to fit Jesus into our own assumptions, rather than sift those assumptions through the commands you mention: love for God, love for neighbor. This post is part of my own attempt to do some of that sifting. The topics you mention are all part of an ongoing series on my own blog. What role do guns have in loving our neighbor? Do we believe Jesus when he says “blessed are the peacemakers”? If we’re pro-life, do we get to choose which lives are worth our concern, and which are expendable? You raise some great questions that we need to be thinking,, praying, and talking about in the months between now and the November elections.
Carol – Thank you for writing this. Following Jesus is difficult and very costly and yet it remains so compelling and attractive to me that I continue to attempt to live into the way of Jesus.
You said: “I start here: I am a fallen, broken person, jealously loyal to my own ideas, selfishly committed to my own ways of seeing, in need of a hand of grace to help me stand free of the misguided assumptions that hold me hostage, that whisper I’m somehow of more value than those others not like me.”
I think that is a great place to start each day and so I am going to print that out and put it where I can see it and read it each morning.
nice weaving together of some pivotal texts and concepts; thanks, and peace!