Recent comments by presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann have stirred up the discussion about gay marriage once again. While speaking to a group of high school…
After many years of personally wrestling with questions swirling around violence, war and faith, I have come to believe that following Jesus Christ and serving in the military in any capacity represent categorically incompatible endeavors. All who follow Jesus should leave the military or refuse to enlist, they should cease espousing war as a noble and honorable venture, and they should actively work towards peace and justice by practicing the ways of non-violent active resistance.
Normally I would avoid such black and white statements for a variety of reasons but I have become thoroughly convinced of these beliefs for two main reasons. First, deeply considering the tensions between serving in the military and serving Jesus have been part of my personal journey of faith. Second, I hold to an understanding of the Gospel that sees non-violence as deeply intertwined with Jesus’ role as the Messiah and therefore deeply intertwined with following that Messiah. I would like to share both.
As for my own journey…
Growing up I had always thought about joining the military and after the summer of my freshman year in high school my goal in life was set: I wanted to become a Navy S.E.A.L. sniper. This became an all-consuming goal that I dedicated myself to completely. I joined a Jr. Navy Program and spent a number of weeks each summer training at military bases. (One of these is where the picture attached to this post comes from.) My academics, extra-curricular activities and sports all became directed at attaining this vision for my life.
I was also a Christian. I failed to see any incompatibility between my goals and my faith. I believed there was a God, that God created humanity in His image, that humanity fell into sin, that Jesus Christ was the Son of God who died for our sins, and that we are saved from Hell and destined for Heaven if we accept Jesus Christ as our savior. I saw no disconnect between this faith and my desire to turn the heads of people created in the image of that God into pink mist at long ranges with a Barrett M82A1 .50 caliber anti-material rifle. I actually thought it would be cool.
In many ways I was a product of my environment. My family, my faith community and the surrounding cultured, all shared narratives and stories that depicted war and military service as honorable, noble and courageous pursuits that did not conflict with the Christian faith. It is no surprise that my views began to change when my environment did.
While I smirk at the thought of encouraging stereotypes, this journey towards peace started in Canada. While 9/11 happened my senior year of high school and I was sorely tempted to enlist, I felt God calling me to something else and instead went to a private Christian school in British Columbia. While I was in Canada, the U.S. invaded Iraq, a decision which was criticized by many Canadians as was my belief that Christians could and should serve in the military. My knee-jerk reaction was to defend my beliefs against these “liberal” Christians. I used Old Testament passages that celebrated killing and violence, clearly showed that God commanded wars and the passage in Ecclesiastes that stated, “there is a time for war.”
However, the problem was that I was really reading my Bible for the first time, and not just listening to and using little verse-bites and proof texts that had saturated the Christian culture around me. Because of this I became increasingly aware that much of what I thought was supported in the Bible actually was not. In fact, many of the practices I had been defending were actually antithetical to what the Bible actually taught. I was also becoming increasingly aware of the messy history of U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. government has a habit of destroying the enemies of today in ways that very predictably and understandably create the enemies of tomorrow.
My journey continued when I returned home after college and watched the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq drag on. Because of my time in the Jr. Navy program I have many friends who entered the military. Thankfully none of them have been killed but a number have returned with severe problems. Anyone who has had a family member or friend who struggles with PTSD, TBI or addiction knows what I am talking about. I saw suicide rates for those in the military, even those who have not been deployed, steadily increase. Due to advent of the internet and social media, I saw humanity’s inhumanity and the horrors of war become increasingly, and at times instantaneously, available for all to see.
During this time I was working with higher-risk youth from poor neighborhoods with a Christian organization. Encouraging our youth to join the military was seen as a practical, if not ideal, solution to many of their problems. It provided a job, a sense of purpose, it got them out of their home and neighborhood environments, and it promised future education. However, I began to question if it was really worth it. Sending our most vulnerable youth to be further traumatized in war, only to return (if at all) to those same environments, continued to make less sense to me.
Around this time I watched the documentary The Fog of War, and Robert McNamara’s words, “We need to think a lot more about killing,” really struck me. The more I thought about killing, violence and war the more war looked less like an appealing video-game, or a way out of poverty, or a noble venture and much more like an incredibly brutal and dehumanizing endeavor that appears to do basic violence to those who participate in it or even prepare for it. While war and violence might appear to “solve” a problem today, they always tend to leave wounds and animosity that fester and seed the next problem down the road. And clearly the wars of the U.S.A are not directed at the command of God but out of our national interests, as determined by U.S. politicians, who are essentially owned by large businesses. Ultimately though, all wars appear to stem out of the fear of scarcity and the fear of death. We fear if we do not fight, we will not have enough of the earth’s rapidly dwindling resources. We fear if we do not kill our enemies, they will kill us first or we will invite more aggression against us by looking weak.
Over the years I have increasingly shifted towards a position of non-violent active resistance but I have remained silent. This was and is an unpopular position in my hometown where nationalism and Christianity blend so thoroughly. However, in the last year, as my understanding of the Gospel has changed, I have become able to articulate why this position is deeply rooted the Gospel of Jesus Christ and inherent to following Jesus as opposed to an optional or debatable matter.
I will present this understanding as best I can in the next post.



I agree. In ’66, I was in my second year at the University of Maryland on a track and field scholarship–and a draft exemption. If you know about that era U of M was home to SDS, students for a democratic society. The Jocks, of which I was supposed to count myself a member in great standing, hated these dirty, long-haired not sure if it was hippies or beatniks then. Anti-American not to slaughter villagers in foreign lands and just plain cowardice.
But I did not need to listen to SDS, although I did, to find my position on war. To me, my faith in Christ made it abundantly clear: war is worldliness and as such enmity against God, never mind the great harm it does to the “least of these”; it actually creates them.
What SDS did help me decide was to do something about what I believed, but a vain political and divisive protest was not it. I would volunteer for the draft, going infantry all the way, and show them that a Christian does not return evil for evil.
The lady at the Selective Service Board tried to vigorously dissuade me from changing my status; this was remarkable and may give an indication where my plan was actually headed.
The story is too long but I never got to make my point, yet not for lack of much concerted effort on my part. I have had forty-six years of pondering and praying over this issue and see no room for a Christian to be an armed combatant for any government. This seems so blatantly plain to me today, it seems quite odd that it somehow remains a question for any of the faithful and sane.
I have been to services where they say The Pledge of Allegiance at the start and refuse to join in. I also feel flags of any nation do not belong in churches. Yes, we are to submit to the governing authorities but we are not, in my eyes, to be patriots: “have a love of country and zeal for its interest.”
Thanks for sharing.
Gerard,
Thanks for your comments.
I think a huge challenge around this issue is that it used to be “blatantly plain” to me (and it still is to many others) that Christians serving in wars is okay because that has been the status quo for so long. The long history of Christians participating in wars sadly often overshadows our call to non-violence and the ways of peace. Taking the time to point that out can be very difficult and can cost you.
-Kevin
I appreciate your article and have often pondered this myself. For some reason war and Christianity all seemed to be wrapped together in the American flag, don’t they?
A popular picture statement going around on Facebook shows a Bible and a gun and says something to the effect of these are two things that are not taught in school but should be. A couple of my relatives “like” a Facebook page called something like “Bibles, Babies and Guns.” How did such incongruious items ever become all mixed together like that. And why are so called “pro-life” people the same ones who also seem pro-war?
I’ve had many an argument with so-called Conservative Christians, and they all seem to resent social programs that help the poor. So I’ve asked them even if they don’t care about “the least of them” don’t they care about themselves? Don’t they think that in making already poor people even more desperate by cutting programs that are getting them by, if this will create crime as they start to come after what you have? The answer is usually if that happens they will stand behind their guns. In other words, they would rather shoot someone than help them.
So, your article is very timely and perhaps as Christians, maybe we should be asking each other “Who would Jesus kill?”
BaB,
Thanks for taking the time to read the article and comment!
This is obviously a generalization but I fear Christianity in America is thoroughly compromised by capitalism, nationalism, and politics (among other things). Christian leaders (pastors and politicians) use fears to stay in power instead of teaching about the God of Israel and pointing people to Jesus. This has many of the followers of Jesus doing the exact opposite of what Jesus taught, even as they claim that their behavior is the one true path of “real” Christians.
-Kevin
P.S. We (Christians) would kill Jesus.
Kevin, yes, it is costly, in a way. The accusations and bitterness that come from other Christians with taking this stand is formidable. And sometimes it is enriching.
I work at a small Christian TV station with two highly Conservative Christians who are also retired military. We have had many, er, spirited discussions over a number of issues, including this one. We all somehow manage to keep civility and kindness at the fore, no matter how strongly we disagree. And that has helped us all grow.
The “What about Hitler?” argument was interesting. Then there was, of course, the supposed scriptural support for war by citing OT battles. The answer to both of these is so simple it defies acceptance. If not for Christians engaged in politics instead of advancing the kingdom, there would have been no rise to power for Hitler or WWII. What if you declared a war and nobody showed up?
The kingdom of God in the OT was a physical one and the temple of God was a structure. Retributive (eye for an eye), not Restorative (7 x 70), justice was in play that demanded physical punishment. A tutelary period. God tried to discourage the top down government of kings but allowed the Jews the consequences of their desires.
The NT is different: Our kingdom is not of this world. We do not fight with the weapons of this world. We do not return evil for evil. One rule, as found in Romans 13 (of all places): love your neighbor.
When did this shift take place? As you know, after the resurrection. Of course Jesus could send out his apostles with a sword, yet might that have been to demonstrate that they need not rely upon it, a useless weight to carry? And might not his instruction to carry a sword suit their progress in truth? Another necessary lesson?
Jesus did not look to dissuade the Centurion from his duties as a soldier. Is it necessary to say that Jesus could read his heart, this one who showed the greatest faith? With such a demonstration of faith, his heart belonged to God; he would act accordingly in the future and such actions might ‘turn” others away from violence. All maybes yet why are these things used so assiduously as solid ground for being armed combatants in war?
Nothing of the New Covenant supports war or political partisanship or patriotism for a worldly power. While it does, in fact, speak plainly against such activities in any number of verses about “worldliness.”
I just needed to say all that for me.